Ecosystems and biodiversity

Rank by measurement area

Total score Governance and strategy Ecosystems and biodiversity Social inclusion and community impact

Filter per region

Filter per industry

The Ecosystems and biodiversity measurement area assesses the extent to which companies understand their impacts and dependencies on nature as well as how they tackle their main pressures on ecosystems and biodiversity. It is composed of sixteen indicators covering topics such as land and sea use change, direct exploitation and invasive alien species.

Ranking overview

Ranking table

 Total score out of 100 Governance and strategy out of 100 Ecosystems and biodiversity out of 100 Social inclusion and community impact out of 100
1 Kering Assessed in 2022
Total score 55.4 /100
Governance and strategy 80.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 47.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 57.8 /100
Governance and strategy 80.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 47.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 57.8 /100
2 UPM-Kymmene Assessed in 2023
Total score 43.7 /100
Governance and strategy 38.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 44.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 45.0 /100
Governance and strategy 38.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 44.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 45.0 /100
3 Mondi Assessed in 2022
Total score 42.1 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 43.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.8 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 43.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.8 /100
4 Unilever Assessed in 2023
Total score 52.0 /100
Governance and strategy 65.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 40.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 64.3 /100
Governance and strategy 65.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 40.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 64.3 /100
5 Nestlé Assessed in 2023
Total score 54.1 /100
Governance and strategy 75.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 39.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 68.4 /100
Governance and strategy 75.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 39.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 68.4 /100
- Sacyr Assessed in 2022
Total score 35.7 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 39.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 39.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.6 /100
7 Danone Assessed in 2023
Total score 46.3 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 38.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.1 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 38.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.1 /100
8 Norsk Hydro Assessed in 2022
Total score 45.7 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 64.2 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 64.2 /100
- Sibanye Stillwater Assessed in 2022
Total score 36.8 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.9 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.9 /100
10 Sanofi Assessed in 2022
Total score 36.7 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 39.4 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 39.4 /100
11 Polyus Assessed in 2022
Total score 34.0 /100
Governance and strategy 43.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 26.5 /100
Governance and strategy 43.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 26.5 /100
12 Ajinomoto Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 39.1 /100
Governance and strategy 62.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.5 /100
Governance and strategy 62.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.5 /100
13 Newmont Assessed in 2022
Total score 46.6 /100
Governance and strategy 57.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.3 /100
Governance and strategy 57.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.3 /100
14 Novartis Assessed in 2022
Total score 39.6 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 42.9 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 42.9 /100
15 Mowi Assessed in 2023
Total score 35.7 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.8 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.8 /100
16 Rio Tinto Assessed in 2022
Total score 45.6 /100
Governance and strategy 65.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 54.3 /100
Governance and strategy 65.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 54.3 /100
17 Fast Retailing Assessed in 2022
Total score 39.2 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 34.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 41.2 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 34.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 41.2 /100
18 Kao Corporation Assessed in 2024
Total score 38.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 34.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 40.5 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 34.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 40.5 /100
19 Merck KGaA Assessed in 2022
Total score 33.5 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 33.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.0 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 33.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.0 /100
20 Shiseido Company Assessed in 2024
Total score 36.6 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 33.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 42.5 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 33.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 42.5 /100
21 Daiwa House Group Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.7 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 33.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 12.1 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 33.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 12.1 /100
22 Bayer Assessed in 2023
Total score 44.9 /100
Governance and strategy 72.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 32.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 53.6 /100
Governance and strategy 72.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 32.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 53.6 /100
23 China Steel Assessed in 2022
Total score 24.5 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 3.0 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 3.0 /100
24 OCP Assessed in 2023
Total score 43.2 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.8 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.8 /100
25 Kerry Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 39.8 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 44.7 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 44.7 /100
26 Charoen Pokphand Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 43.6 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 55.9 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 55.9 /100
- Meiji Assessed in 2023
Total score 34.3 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 37.0 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 37.0 /100
28 Ecolab Assessed in 2022
Total score 30.9 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.1 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.1 /100
29 Givaudan Assessed in 2023
Total score 44.2 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 62.2 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 62.2 /100
30 Siam Cement (SCG) Assessed in 2022
Total score 31.5 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.1 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.1 /100
31 CMPC Assessed in 2023
Total score 28.9 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.1 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.1 /100
32 Thai Union Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 39.5 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 45.2 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 45.2 /100
33 Holcim Assessed in 2022
Total score 38.4 /100
Governance and strategy 42.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 50.0 /100
Governance and strategy 42.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 50.0 /100
34 L'Oreal Assessed in 2024
Total score 39.9 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 52.5 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 52.5 /100
- Owens Corning Assessed in 2022
Total score 29.8 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
- Sekisui House Assessed in 2022
Total score 26.5 /100
Governance and strategy 38.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 16.1 /100
Governance and strategy 38.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 16.1 /100
37 Kirin Assessed in 2023
Total score 32.1 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 32.0 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 32.0 /100
- Reckitt Assessed in 2024
Total score 34.2 /100
Governance and strategy 18.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 47.4 /100
Governance and strategy 18.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 47.4 /100
39 Anheuser-Busch InBev Assessed in 2023
Total score 35.1 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 44.0 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 44.0 /100
- Fonterra Assessed in 2023
Total score 36.1 /100
Governance and strategy 63.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 35.2 /100
Governance and strategy 63.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 35.2 /100
41 Ferrovial Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.7 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.0 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.0 /100
42 Gap Assessed in 2022
Total score 34.1 /100
Governance and strategy 36.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 40.8 /100
Governance and strategy 36.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 40.8 /100
43 Saipem Assessed in 2022
Total score 30.7 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.1 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.1 /100
44 Polymetal Assessed in 2022
Total score 30.8 /100
Governance and strategy 31.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.5 /100
Governance and strategy 31.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.5 /100
45 Colgate-Palmolive Assessed in 2024
Total score 29.5 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.4 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.4 /100
46 Vale Assessed in 2022
Total score 43.5 /100
Governance and strategy 62.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.2 /100
Governance and strategy 62.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.2 /100
47 FMC Assessed in 2023
Total score 33.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.6 /100
48 Hyundai Engineering and Construction Assessed in 2022
Total score 32.9 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.1 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.1 /100
- Nueva Pescanova Assessed in 2023
Total score 32.7 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.9 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.9 /100
50 Beiersdorf Assessed in 2024
Total score 27.2 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.6 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.6 /100
51 BASF Assessed in 2023
Total score 29.8 /100
Governance and strategy 55.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.6 /100
Governance and strategy 55.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.6 /100
52 NLMK Group Assessed in 2022
Total score 29.5 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.8 /100
53 Berry Global Assessed in 2022
Total score 28.0 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.9 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.9 /100
54 Henkel Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.8 /100
55 Firmenich Assessed in 2023
Total score 37.0 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 50.5 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 50.5 /100
- POSCO Assessed in 2022
Total score 32.3 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 37.0 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 37.0 /100
57 Smurfit Kappa Group Assessed in 2022
Total score 28.3 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.3 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.3 /100
58 DSM Assessed in 2023
Total score 31.0 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 35.5 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 35.5 /100
- Target Assessed in 2024
Total score 29.0 /100
Governance and strategy 38.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.3 /100
Governance and strategy 38.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.3 /100
- Wilmar International Assessed in 2023
Total score 41.6 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 61.1 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 61.1 /100
61 Diageo Assessed in 2023
Total score 40.1 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.8 /100
62 Cargill Assessed in 2023
Total score 28.2 /100
Governance and strategy 23.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 32.2 /100
Governance and strategy 23.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 32.2 /100
- Gildan Activewear Assessed in 2022
Total score 35.4 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 46.8 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 46.8 /100
64 Evonik Assessed in 2023
Total score 33.0 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 39.7 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 39.7 /100
65 PVH Assessed in 2022
Total score 32.8 /100
Governance and strategy 36.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 41.3 /100
Governance and strategy 36.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 41.3 /100
66 ACCIONA Assessed in 2022
Total score 42.5 /100
Governance and strategy 73.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 56.1 /100
Governance and strategy 73.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 56.1 /100
- Hermes International Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.1 /100
Governance and strategy 36.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.3 /100
Governance and strategy 36.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.3 /100
- Nippon Steel Corporation Assessed in 2022
Total score 18.9 /100
Governance and strategy 18.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 8.2 /100
Governance and strategy 18.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 8.2 /100
- Procter & Gamble Assessed in 2024
Total score 25.0 /100
Governance and strategy 23.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.5 /100
Governance and strategy 23.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.5 /100
- Symrise Assessed in 2023
Total score 31.9 /100
Governance and strategy 33.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 40.7 /100
Governance and strategy 33.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 40.7 /100
- Yara Assessed in 2023
Total score 36.9 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 46.6 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 46.6 /100
72 Johnson & Johnson Assessed in 2022
Total score 30.2 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.3 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.3 /100
73 Levi Strauss & Co. Assessed in 2022
Total score 26.6 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.9 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.9 /100
74 Asahi Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 29.5 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.7 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.7 /100
75 Industria de Diseño Textil (Inditex) Assessed in 2022
Total score 37.4 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 52.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 52.8 /100
- McCormick Assessed in 2023
Total score 23.9 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.4 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.4 /100
77 Amorepacific Group Assessed in 2024
Total score 28.9 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.5 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.5 /100
- Thai Beverage Assessed in 2023
Total score 26.5 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.5 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.5 /100
79 Alcoa Assessed in 2022
Total score 30.9 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 38.6 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 38.6 /100
80 METRO Assessed in 2023
Total score 25.5 /100
Governance and strategy 23.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.4 /100
Governance and strategy 23.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.4 /100
81 Carlsberg Assessed in 2023
Total score 33.4 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 44.2 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 44.2 /100
- Conagra Brands Assessed in 2023
Total score 21.7 /100
Governance and strategy 17.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 18.6 /100
Governance and strategy 17.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 18.6 /100
- The Clorox Company Assessed in 2024
Total score 24.7 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 18.6 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 18.6 /100
84 The Estée Lauder Companies Assessed in 2024
Total score 25.1 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 21.8 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 21.8 /100
85 GSK Assessed in 2022
Total score 29.3 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.0 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.0 /100
- Vedanta Resources Assessed in 2022
Total score 28.2 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.1 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.1 /100
87 Svenska Cellulosa Assessed in 2023
Total score 26.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.6 /100
88 AstraZeneca Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.4 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
- Eastman Chemical Assessed in 2022
Total score 25.2 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.1 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.1 /100
- Eli Lilly and Company Assessed in 2022
Total score 18.4 /100
Governance and strategy 25.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 6.7 /100
Governance and strategy 25.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 6.7 /100
- Essity Assessed in 2024
Total score 27.2 /100
Governance and strategy 17.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 35.9 /100
Governance and strategy