Governance and strategy

Rank by measurement area

Total score Governance and strategy Ecosystems and biodiversity Social inclusion and community impact

Filter per region

Filter per industry

The Governance and strategy measurement area assesses companies on the integration of sustainability objectives and targets into a their core strategy, business model and governance structure. It covers four main aspects: sustainability strategy, accountability systems, stakeholder engagement and lobbying and advocacy.

Ranking overview

Ranking table

 Total score out of 100 Governance and strategy out of 100 Ecosystems and biodiversity out of 100 Social inclusion and community impact out of 100
1 Kering Assessed in 2022
Total score 55.4 /100
Governance and strategy 80.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 47.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 57.8 /100
Governance and strategy 80.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 47.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 57.8 /100
2 Nestlé Assessed in 2023
Total score 54.1 /100
Governance and strategy 75.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 39.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 68.4 /100
Governance and strategy 75.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 39.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 68.4 /100
3 ACCIONA Assessed in 2022
Total score 42.5 /100
Governance and strategy 73.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 56.1 /100
Governance and strategy 73.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 56.1 /100
4 Bayer Assessed in 2023
Total score 44.9 /100
Governance and strategy 72.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 32.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 53.6 /100
Governance and strategy 72.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 32.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 53.6 /100
5 CEMEX Assessed in 2022
Total score 34.8 /100
Governance and strategy 70.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 20.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 43.7 /100
Governance and strategy 70.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 20.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 43.7 /100
6 Unilever Assessed in 2023
Total score 52.0 /100
Governance and strategy 65.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 40.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 64.3 /100
Governance and strategy 65.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 40.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 64.3 /100
7 Rio Tinto Assessed in 2022
Total score 45.6 /100
Governance and strategy 65.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 54.3 /100
Governance and strategy 65.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 54.3 /100
8 Fonterra Assessed in 2023
Total score 36.1 /100
Governance and strategy 63.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 35.2 /100
Governance and strategy 63.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 35.2 /100
9 Ajinomoto Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 39.1 /100
Governance and strategy 62.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.5 /100
Governance and strategy 62.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.5 /100
- Vale Assessed in 2022
Total score 43.5 /100
Governance and strategy 62.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.2 /100
Governance and strategy 62.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.2 /100
11 Charoen Pokphand Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 43.6 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 55.9 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 55.9 /100
- FrieslandCampina Assessed in 2023
Total score 29.2 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 29.0 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 29.0 /100
- Kerry Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 39.8 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 44.7 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 44.7 /100
- Mondi Assessed in 2022
Total score 42.1 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 43.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.8 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 43.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.8 /100
- Thai Union Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 39.5 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 45.2 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 45.2 /100
16 CRH Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.1 /100
Governance and strategy 60.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.5 /100
Governance and strategy 60.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.5 /100
17 Sainsbury's Assessed in 2023
Total score 33.8 /100
Governance and strategy 57.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 41.0 /100
Governance and strategy 57.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 41.0 /100
- Teck Resources Assessed in 2022
Total score 40.2 /100
Governance and strategy 57.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.0 /100
Governance and strategy 57.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.0 /100
19 Newmont Assessed in 2022
Total score 46.6 /100
Governance and strategy 57.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.3 /100
Governance and strategy 57.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 59.3 /100
20 Nueva Pescanova Assessed in 2023
Total score 32.7 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.9 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.9 /100
- Siam Cement (SCG) Assessed in 2022
Total score 31.5 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.1 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.1 /100
- Sibanye Stillwater Assessed in 2022
Total score 36.8 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.9 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 36.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.9 /100
- The Foschini Group (TFG) Assessed in 2022
Total score 14.0 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 4.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 12.6 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 4.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 12.6 /100
- Yara Assessed in 2023
Total score 36.9 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 46.6 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 46.6 /100
- Zijin Mining Assessed in 2022
Total score 25.6 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 26.9 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 26.9 /100
26 BASF Assessed in 2023
Total score 29.8 /100
Governance and strategy 55.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.6 /100
Governance and strategy 55.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.6 /100
27 Sumitomo Corporation Assessed in 2024
Total score 25.9 /100
Governance and strategy 53.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 20.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.2 /100
Governance and strategy 53.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 20.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.2 /100
28 Glencore Assessed in 2022
Total score 34.4 /100
Governance and strategy 53.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 19.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 50.9 /100
Governance and strategy 53.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 19.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 50.9 /100
29 Anglo American Assessed in 2022
Total score 37.3 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 22.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 55.2 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 22.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 55.2 /100
- Asia Cement Corporation Assessed in 2022
Total score 21.5 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 13.9 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 13.9 /100
- FMC Assessed in 2023
Total score 33.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.6 /100
- Fast Retailing Assessed in 2022
Total score 39.2 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 34.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 41.2 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 34.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 41.2 /100
- GSK Assessed in 2022
Total score 29.3 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.0 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.0 /100
- Givaudan Assessed in 2023
Total score 44.2 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 62.2 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 30.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 62.2 /100
- Kao Corporation Assessed in 2024
Total score 38.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 34.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 40.5 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 34.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 40.5 /100
- LOTTE Chemical Assessed in 2022
Total score 17.5 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 9.7 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 9.7 /100
- Newcrest Mining Assessed in 2022
Total score 28.9 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.6 /100
- PepsiCo Assessed in 2023
Total score 37.8 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 54.3 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 54.3 /100
- Sacyr Assessed in 2022
Total score 35.7 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 39.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 39.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.6 /100
40 China Steel Assessed in 2022
Total score 24.5 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 3.0 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 3.0 /100
- Harmony Gold Assessed in 2022
Total score 22.8 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 19.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 17.4 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 19.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 17.4 /100
- Hyundai Engineering and Construction Assessed in 2022
Total score 32.9 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.1 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.1 /100
- Implats Assessed in 2022
Total score 21.1 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 16.9 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 16.9 /100
- Indorama Ventures Assessed in 2022
Total score 22.4 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.6 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.6 /100
- International Paper Assessed in 2022
Total score 19.2 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 11.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.3 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 11.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.3 /100
- Mosaic Assessed in 2023
Total score 22.7 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.4 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.4 /100
- OCP Assessed in 2023
Total score 43.2 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.8 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.8 /100
- PSA International Assessed in 2024
Total score 17.8 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 11.7 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 11.7 /100
- Solvay Assessed in 2022
Total score 23.1 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.1 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.1 /100
- Wilmar International Assessed in 2023
Total score 41.6 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 61.1 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 61.1 /100
51 Fortescue Assessed in 2022
Total score 22.6 /100
Governance and strategy 48.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 21.9 /100
Governance and strategy 48.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 21.9 /100
52 Danone Assessed in 2023
Total score 46.3 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 38.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.1 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 38.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.1 /100
- L'Oreal Assessed in 2024
Total score 39.9 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 52.5 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 52.5 /100
- Levi Strauss & Co. Assessed in 2022
Total score 26.6 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.9 /100
Governance and strategy 47.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.9 /100
55 Pfizer Assessed in 2022
Total score 29.9 /100
Governance and strategy 47.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 36.6 /100
Governance and strategy 47.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 36.6 /100
56 Air Liquide Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 39.2 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 39.2 /100
- Archer Daniels Midland Assessed in 2023
Total score 27.9 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.2 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.2 /100
- AstraZeneca Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.4 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
- Falabella Assessed in 2024
Total score 22.3 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.8 /100
- Industria de Diseño Textil (Inditex) Assessed in 2022
Total score 37.4 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 52.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 52.8 /100
- JSW Group Assessed in 2022
Total score 23.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.6 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.6 /100
- Lundin Mining Assessed in 2024
Total score 27.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.3 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 30.3 /100
- Metalurgica Gerdau Assessed in 2022
Total score 23.0 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 17.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 21.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 17.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 21.8 /100
- NLMK Group Assessed in 2022
Total score 29.5 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.8 /100
- Novartis Assessed in 2022
Total score 39.6 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 42.9 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 35.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 42.9 /100
- SABIC Assessed in 2022
Total score 19.3 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 14.6 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 14.6 /100
- Saipem Assessed in 2022
Total score 30.7 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.1 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 29.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.1 /100
- Sodexo Assessed in 2023
Total score 25.4 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 32.8 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 32.8 /100
- South32 Assessed in 2022
Total score 30.9 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 35.3 /100
Governance and strategy 46.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 24.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 35.3 /100
70 Merck & Co Assessed in 2022
Total score 23.2 /100
Governance and strategy 46.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 21.6 /100
Governance and strategy 46.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 21.6 /100
71 Ahold Delhaize Assessed in 2023
Total score 31.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 46.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 46.8 /100
- Boskalis Assessed in 2022
Total score 17.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.8 /100
- Coles Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 28.0 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 42.9 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 42.9 /100
- Dabur Assessed in 2024
Total score 22.9 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 16.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 16.6 /100
- Daiwa House Group Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.7 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 33.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 12.1 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 33.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 12.1 /100
- Diageo Assessed in 2023
Total score 40.1 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 26.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.8 /100
- Fuji Oil Assessed in 2023
Total score 27.3 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 22.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.9 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 22.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 27.9 /100
- GS Engineering & Construction Assessed in 2022
Total score 20.2 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 19.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 11.2 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 19.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 11.2 /100
- Hankook Tire & Technology Assessed in 2022
Total score 19.9 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 15.9 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 15.9 /100
- Henkel Assessed in 2022
Total score 27.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.8 /100
- International Flavors & Fragrances Assessed in 2023
Total score 24.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.3 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.3 /100
- JDE Peet's Assessed in 2023
Total score 28.2 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 20.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 20.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.8 /100
- Johnson & Johnson Assessed in 2022
Total score 30.2 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.3 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.3 /100
- K+S Assessed in 2023
Total score 18.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
- Kroger Assessed in 2023
Total score 20.5 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 11.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 11.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
- Ma'aden Assessed in 2022
Total score 19.2 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 16.7 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 16.7 /100
- Nornickel Assessed in 2022
Total score 30.0 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.7 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.7 /100
- Northam Platinum Assessed in 2022
Total score 17.3 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 11.2 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 11.2 /100
- Nutrien Assessed in 2023
Total score 25.3 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.6 /100
- SSP Group Assessed in 2023
Total score 18.9 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 26.5 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 26.5 /100
- Sappi Assessed in 2023
Total score 21.9 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact