Agricultural inputs

Rank by industry

All industries Agricultural inputs Agricultural products and commodities Animal proteins Food and beverage manufacturers/processors Food retailers Restaurants and food service Food and agriculture Paper and forest

Rank by measurement area

Filter per region

Companies included in the agricultural inputs segment are active in the manufacturing and sales of fertilisers or agrochemical products, and breeding and sales of seeds. They supply farmers with products and services needed to grow their crops and business.

Ranking table

 Total score out of 100 Governance and strategy out of 100 Ecosystems and biodiversity out of 100 Social inclusion and community impact out of 100
1 Bayer
Total score 44.9 /100
Governance and strategy 72.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 32.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 53.6 /100
2 Charoen Pokphand Group
Total score 43.6 /100
Governance and strategy 61.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 55.9 /100
3 OCP
Total score 43.2 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 31.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 58.8 /100
4 Wilmar International
Total score 41.6 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 61.1 /100
5 Yara
Total score 36.9 /100
Governance and strategy 56.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 25.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 46.6 /100
6 FMC
Total score 33.6 /100
Governance and strategy 51.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 28.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.6 /100
7 BASF
Total score 29.8 /100
Governance and strategy 55.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.6 /100
8 Nutrien
Total score 25.3 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.6 /100
9 ICL
Total score 25.1 /100
Governance and strategy 41.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 22.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.3 /100
10 Sociedad Quimica y Minera
Total score 23.7 /100
Governance and strategy 38.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 12.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 34.8 /100
11 Syngenta Group
Total score 23.7 /100
Governance and strategy 27.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 19.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 28.8 /100
12 Mosaic
Total score 22.7 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.4 /100
13 Nufarm
Total score 22.4 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 20.8 /100
14 Mitsui
Total score 21.6 /100
Governance and strategy 28.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 17.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.5 /100
15 UPL
Total score 21.4 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 33.7 /100
16 CF Industries
Total score 21.1 /100
Governance and strategy 38.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 18.8 /100
17 BayWa
Total score 21.0 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 29.6 /100
18 Olam International
Total score 20.2 /100
Governance and strategy 33.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 9.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.5 /100
19 Sumitomo Chemical
Total score 20.0 /100
Governance and strategy 28.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 19.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 18.1 /100
20 K+S
Total score 18.6 /100
Governance and strategy 45.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.8 /100
21 PhosAgro
Total score 18.5 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 18.6 /100
22 Marubeni Corporation
Total score 16.2 /100
Governance and strategy 38.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 9.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 17.4 /100
23 Corteva Agriscience
Total score 15.8 /100
Governance and strategy 23.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 16.4 /100
24 Mitsubishi Corporation
Total score 15.7 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 12.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 15.2 /100
25 Amaggi Group
Total score 14.7 /100
Governance and strategy 18.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 10.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.9 /100
26 DLG Group
Total score 13.9 /100
Governance and strategy 12.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 14.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 14.1 /100
27 Land O'Lakes
Total score 13.6 /100
Governance and strategy 25.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 11.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 12.6 /100
28 KWS
Total score 10.4 /100
Governance and strategy 23.8 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 4.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 14.1 /100
29 Agrifirm
Total score 8.9 /100
Governance and strategy 12.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 9.2 /100
30 Louis Dreyfus Company
Total score 7.5 /100
Governance and strategy 17.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 4.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 8.4 /100
31 RusAgro
Total score 7.0 /100
Governance and strategy 10.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 6.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 5.9 /100
32 CHS
Total score 6.7 /100
Governance and strategy 12.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 2.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 10.4 /100
33 Groupe Limagrain
Total score 6.5 /100
Governance and strategy 12.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 5.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 5.2 /100
34 Danish Agro
Total score 6.4 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 4.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 11.9 /100
35 EuroChem
Total score 5.7 /100
Governance and strategy 6.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 1.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 11.9 /100
36 J.R. Simplot
Total score 5.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 2.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 10.4 /100
37 Union Invivo
Total score 4.2 /100
Governance and strategy 6.3 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 4.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 2.2 /100
38 Murugappa Group
Total score 3.6 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 6.8 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100
39 Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative
Total score 1.5 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 2.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100
40 Wilbur-Ellis
Total score 0.7 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 1.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100
41 Guizhou Phosphate Chemical Group
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 0.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100
- National Agricultural Cooperative Federation
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 0.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100
- Southern States Cooperative
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 0.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100
- ZEN-NOH
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 0.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100