Filter per region

Keystone electric utilities should be developing new business models that enable them to decarbonise and remain profitable in a low-carbon world. Through one indicator, 9.1 (weighted 10% of the performance assessment), this module assesses the maturity of the new low-carbon business models the 50 companies are developing, examining profitability, business size, project growth and deployment schedules. It is weighted 10% of the performance assessment.

Ranking overview

1 CEZ Group
Total score 2.0 /2
Business Model 2.0 /2
- Dominion Energy
Total score 2.0 /2
Business Model 2.0 /2
- ENGIE
Total score 2.0 /2
Business Model 2.0 /2
- Eletrobras
Total score 2.0 /2
Business Model 2.0 /2
- Enel
Total score 2.0 /2
Business Model 2.0 /2
- Nextera Energy
Total score 2.0 /2
Business Model 2.0 /2
- Électricité de France (EDF)
Total score 2.0 /2
Business Model 2.0 /2
- Ørsted
Total score 2.0 /2
Business Model 2.0 /2
9 AES Corporation
Total score 1.9 /2
Business Model 1.9 /2
- EnBW Energie Baden-Wuerttemberg
Total score 1.9 /2
Business Model 1.9 /2
- Vattenfall
Total score 1.9 /2
Business Model 1.9 /2
12 E.ON
Total score 1.8 /2
Business Model 1.8 /2
- Iberdrola
Total score 1.8 /2
Business Model 1.8 /2
- RWE
Total score 1.8 /2
Business Model 1.8 /2
15 EDP Energias de Portugal
Total score 1.6 /2
Business Model 1.6 /2
16 CLP Holdings (中電集團)
Total score 1.5 /2
Business Model 1.5 /2
- China Three Gorges (中国长江三峡集团)
Total score 1.5 /2
Business Model 1.5 /2
- Kansai Electric Power Company (KEPCO)
Total score 1.5 /2
Business Model 1.5 /2
- Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)
Total score 1.5 /2
Business Model 1.5 /2
- SSE 
Total score 1.5 /2
Business Model 1.5 /2
21 American Electric Power (AEP)
Total score 1.3 /2
Business Model 1.3 /2
- Vistra Energy Corp
Total score 1.3 /2
Business Model 1.3 /2
- Xcel Energy
Total score 1.3 /2
Business Model 1.3 /2
24 Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN)
Total score 1.0 /2
Business Model 1.0 /2
- Tenaga Nasional
Total score 1.0 /2
Business Model 1.0 /2
- Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)
Total score 1.0 /2
Business Model 1.0 /2
27 China Huadian Corporation (中国华电集团)
Total score 0.8 /2
Business Model 0.8 /2
- China Huaneng Group (中国华能集团)
Total score 0.8 /2
Business Model 0.8 /2
- Duke Energy
Total score 0.8 /2
Business Model 0.8 /2
- Inter RAO
Total score 0.8 /2
Business Model 0.8 /2
- Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO/Hanjeon)
Total score 0.8 /2
Business Model 0.8 /2
- Origin Energy
Total score 0.8 /2
Business Model 0.8 /2
- Saudi Electricity Company (SEC)
Total score 0.8 /2
Business Model 0.8 /2
34 Chubu Electric Power
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
- Chugoku Electric Power Company
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
- Fortum
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
- Kyushu Electric Power
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
- NTPC
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
- Southern Co
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
- State Power Investment Corporation (SPIC) (国家电力投资集团)
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
- Taiwan Power Company (台灣電力公司)
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
- Tohoku Electric Power
Total score 0.5 /2
Business Model 0.5 /2
44 Exelon Corporation
Total score 0.4 /2
Business Model 0.4 /2
45 Egyptian Electricity Holding Company (EEHC)
Total score 0.3 /2
Business Model 0.3 /2
46 China Datang Corp (中国大唐集团)
Total score 0.1 /2
Business Model 0.1 /2
- China Energy Investment Group (CHN Energy) (国家能源投资集团)
Total score 0.1 /2
Business Model 0.1 /2
48 AGL Energy
Total score 0.0 /2
Business Model 0.0 /2
- Comision Federal de Electricidad (CFE)
Total score 0.0 /2
Business Model 0.0 /2
- Eskom Holdings
Total score 0.0 /2
Business Model 0.0 /2