Advancing corporate human rights by assessing companies’ human rights commitments, due-diligence processes, and implementation efforts.
Compared to the last CHRB iteration, 80% of companies improved while 20% regressed or stagnated, including several former top performers. This volatility suggests that embedding human rights in corporate practice requires sustained commitment and that progress is not guaranteed to persist.
Motor vehicle manufacturers saw the largest sectorial improvement, gaining 16 percentage points, yet remain the lowest-scoring sector, meeting only 44% of requirements compared to 64% for extractives and 58% for food and agriculture.
While 87% of companies embed human rights in supplier contracts, only 39% commit to responsible purchasing practices. This gap means many suppliers are facing double demands from buyers who expect suppliers to meet standards while subjecting them to pricing pressures and delayed payments, which undermine their capacity to do so.
Despite growing regulatory expectations on supply chain due diligence, only 24% of companies disclose names and locations of significant suppliers. This opacity constrains affected stakeholders from raising concerns and limits accountability across complex supply chains.
Board review of human rights strategy rose to 75% of companies, compared with 47% in the last iteration, demonstrating a growing integration of human rights into governance practices. Yet only 10% of companies assess where human rights risks originate from or relate to their business model and strategy, a foundational step for effective due diligence under emerging regulatory frameworks.
The CHRB assesses around 100 companies operating in five high-risk sectors - food and agricultural products, apparel, extractives, ICT manufacturing and automotive manufacturing. The companies are scored across five measurement areas, each containing a series of indicators focusing on different aspects of how a business seeks to respect human rights in its own operations and supply chain.
| Company Name | Total Score | Policy commitments | Board-level accountability | Embedding respect for human rights into culture and management systems | Human rights due diligence | Remedies and grievance mechanisms | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eni
|
94.4/100 |
50.0/100 |
100.0/100 |
93.8/100 |
100.0/100 |
100.0/100 |
|
Puma
|
92.7/100 |
33.3/100 |
100.0/100 |
97.1/100 |
95.0/100 |
100.0/100 |
|
Rio Tinto
|
90.0/100 |
75.0/100 |
66.7/100 |
88.8/100 |
90.0/100 |
100.0/100 |
|
Repsol
|
89.4/100 |
50.0/100 |
83.3/100 |
87.5/100 |
100.0/100 |
93.8/100 |
|
Freeport-McMoRan
|
83.8/100 |
75.0/100 |
50.0/100 |
82.5/100 |
85.0/100 |
93.8/100 |
|
Unilever
|
82.1/100 |
75.0/100 |
50.0/100 |
69.3/100 |
100.0/100 |
87.5/100 |
|
Coles Group
|
81.0/100 |
50.0/100 |
83.3/100 |
76.9/100 |
68.3/100 |
100.0/100 |
|
Newmont
|
79.0/100 |
25.0/100 |
66.7/100 |
82.5/100 |
85.0/100 |
87.5/100 |
|
Nestle
|
79.0/100 |
75.0/100 |
50.0/100 |
72.1/100 |
85.0/100 |
87.5/100 |
|
Fast Retailing
|
78.9/100 |
83.3/100 |
66.7/100 |
76.9/100 |
63.3/100 |
93.8/100 |
Explore the latest data, download for further analysis or integrate into your own workflows using our API.
Keep up to date with all the latest from World Benchmarking Alliance