Filter per region

55 of the largest extractives companies in the world were assessed against the CHRB Methodology for the fifth time. The average score is 23.4/100. Three companies (Repsol, Newmont and Eni) score above 50/100, while 47% of companies score below 20/100.

Ranking table

Total score out of 100 Governance and policy commitments out of 10 Embedding respect and human rights due diligence out of 25 Remedies and grievance mechanisms out of 20 Performance: Practices out of 25 Performance: Responses out of 20
1 Repsol Extractives
Total score 65.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 4.7 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 17.8 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 11.5 /20
Performance: Practices 18.8 /25
Performance: Responses 13.2 /20
2 Newmont  Extractives
Total score 59.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 5.3 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 17.1 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 13.0 /20
Performance: Practices 16.7 /25
Performance: Responses 7.8 /20
3 Eni Extractives
Total score 55.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 6.3 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 19.0 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 13.0 /20
Performance: Practices 13.9 /25
Performance: Responses 3.8 /20
4 Freeport-McMoRan Extractives
Total score 48.3 /100
Governance and policy commitments 5.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 19.7 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 9.5 /20
Performance: Practices 9.7 /25
Performance: Responses 3.8 /20
5 Rio Tinto Extractives
Total score 43.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 5.8 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 14.7 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 11.5 /20
Performance: Practices 15.3 /25
Performance: Responses 3.8 /20
6 Anglo American Extractives
Total score 41.4 /100
Governance and policy commitments 5.0 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 11.4 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 7.5 /20
Performance: Practices 12.5 /25
Performance: Responses 5.0 /20
7 OMV Extractives
Total score 41.1 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 11.3 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 9.0 /20
Performance: Practices 9.0 /25
Performance: Responses 8.2 /20
8 BP Extractives
Total score 40.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 4.5 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 12.3 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 7.5 /20
Performance: Practices 8.3 /25
Performance: Responses 8.2 /20
9 Shell PLC Extractives
Total score 40.0 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.1 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 13.8 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 6.5 /20
Performance: Practices 9.7 /25
Performance: Responses 6.9 /20
10 BHP Group Extractives
Total score 39.8 /100
Governance and policy commitments 4.4 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 11.1 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 8.0 /20
Performance: Practices 11.8 /25
Performance: Responses 4.6 /20
11 Equinor Extractives
Total score 38.8 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.8 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 13.9 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 6.5 /20
Performance: Practices 6.9 /25
Performance: Responses 7.8 /20
12 Ecopetrol  Extractives
Total score 37.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 9.8 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 6.5 /20
Performance: Practices 10.4 /25
Performance: Responses 7.6 /20
13 Barrick Gold Extractives
Total score 37.1 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 15.9 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 7.5 /20
Performance: Practices 5.6 /25
Performance: Responses 4.6 /20
14 Grupo Mexico Extractives
Total score 36.1 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.2 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 7.3 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 8.5 /20
Performance: Practices 12.5 /25
Performance: Responses 5.6 /20
15 TotalEnergies Extractives
Total score 33.3 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.8 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 8.4 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.5 /20
Performance: Practices 13.2 /25
Performance: Responses 5.4 /20
16 Chevron Extractives
Total score 33.1 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 7.3 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 10.0 /20
Performance: Practices 5.6 /25
Performance: Responses 6.6 /20
17 Teck Resources Extractives
Total score 32.8 /100
Governance and policy commitments 4.7 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 8.2 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 6.0 /20
Performance: Practices 7.6 /25
Performance: Responses 6.3 /20
18 Holcim Extractives
Total score 32.0 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 13.2 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 4.5 /20
Performance: Practices 6.9 /25
Performance: Responses 3.8 /20
19 Glencore Extractives
Total score 31.6 /100
Governance and policy commitments 4.5 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 8.2 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 7.5 /20
Performance: Practices 6.2 /25
Performance: Responses 5.2 /20
20 PTT Extractives
Total score 30.8 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.1 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 9.1 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 7.5 /20
Performance: Practices 4.9 /25
Performance: Responses 6.2 /20
21 Petrobras Extractives
Total score 28.7 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.2 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 5.2 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 7.5 /20
Performance: Practices 11.8 /25
Performance: Responses 2.1 /20
22 ENEOS Extractives
Total score 25.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.5 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 7.0 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 5.0 /20
Performance: Practices 6.3 /25
Performance: Responses 5.2 /20
23 Vale Extractives
Total score 25.8 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.9 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 11.6 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 7.5 /20
Performance: Practices 7.6 /25
Performance: Responses 3.8 /20
24 ConocoPhillips Extractives
Total score 22.7 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.3 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 8.5 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.5 /20
Performance: Practices 4.9 /25
Performance: Responses 4.5 /20
25 Exxon Mobil Extractives
Total score 22.6 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 6.4 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 5.0 /20
Performance: Practices 7.6 /25
Performance: Responses 2.1 /20
26 Woodside Petroleum Extractives
Total score 21.6 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.9 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 5.4 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 5.0 /20
Performance: Practices 5.6 /25
Performance: Responses 3.8 /20
27 HeidelbergCement Extractives
Total score 21.5 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.9 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 5.6 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 5.5 /20
Performance: Practices 4.2 /25
Performance: Responses 4.3 /20
28 Nornickel Extractives
Total score 21.0 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.5 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 1.4 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 6.0 /20
Performance: Practices 6.9 /25
Performance: Responses 4.2 /20
29 UltraTech Cement Extractives
Total score 20.3 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.9 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 5.5 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 4.0 /20
Performance: Practices 4.9 /25
Performance: Responses 4.1 /20
30 ArcelorMittal Extractives
Total score 19.6 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 2.5 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.5 /20
Performance: Practices 6.3 /25
Performance: Responses 3.8 /20
31 Siam Cement (SCG) Extractives
Total score 19.4 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.0 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 6.0 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 4.0 /20
Performance: Practices 3.5 /25
Performance: Responses 3.9 /20
32 Sasol Extractives
Total score 18.6 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.0 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 6.2 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 5.0 /20
Performance: Practices 0.7 /25
Performance: Responses 3.7 /20
33 Suncor Energy  Extractives
Total score 17.0 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.0 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 1.8 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.5 /20
Performance: Practices 6.3 /25
Performance: Responses 3.4 /20
34 Rosneft Extractives
Total score 16.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 1.6 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.5 /20
Performance: Practices 4.9 /25
Performance: Responses 3.4 /20
35 NLMK Group Extractives
Total score 16.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.7 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 4.3 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 4.0 /20
Performance: Practices 3.5 /25
Performance: Responses 3.4 /20
36 Inpex  Extractives
Total score 16.2 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.3 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 4.8 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.0 /20
Performance: Practices 2.8 /25
Performance: Responses 3.2 /20
37 POSCO Extractives
Total score 14.6 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.7 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 6.8 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 2.5 /20
Performance: Practices 0.7 /25
Performance: Responses 2.9 /20
38 Severstal Extractives
Total score 13.4 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.7 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 3.6 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.0 /20
Performance: Practices 1.4 /25
Performance: Responses 2.7 /20
39 Lukoil Extractives
Total score 13.1 /100
Governance and policy commitments 2.5 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.7 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 4.5 /20
Performance: Practices 2.8 /25
Performance: Responses 2.6 /20
40 Tatneft Extractives
Total score 10.0 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.7 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.7 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.5 /20
Performance: Practices 2.1 /25
Performance: Responses 2.0 /20
41 Canadian Natural Resources Extractives
Total score 9.2 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.6 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.2 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.5 /20
Performance: Practices 2.1 /25
Performance: Responses 1.8 /20
42 Occidental Petroleum Extractives
Total score 8.0 /100
Governance and policy commitments 3.0 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.5 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 2.5 /20
Performance: Practices 2.1 /25
Performance: Responses 0.0 /20
43 EOG Resources  Extractives
Total score 7.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.4 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.7 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.5 /20
Performance: Practices 0.7 /25
Performance: Responses 1.6 /20
44 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Extractives
Total score 7.8 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.9 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.2 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.0 /20
Performance: Practices 2.1 /25
Performance: Responses 1.6 /20
45 Phillips 66 Extractives
Total score 7.5 /100
Governance and policy commitments 1.1 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.7 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.5 /20
Performance: Practices 0.7 /25
Performance: Responses 1.5 /20
46 Nippon Steel Corporation Extractives
Total score 7.1 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.2 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.2 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 2.5 /20
Performance: Practices 2.8 /25
Performance: Responses 1.4 /20
47 Saudi Aramco Extractives
Total score 6.9 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.2 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.7 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 4.0 /20
Performance: Practices 0.7 /25
Performance: Responses 1.4 /20
48 Gazprom Extractives
Total score 6.4 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.8 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.5 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 1.0 /20
Performance: Practices 4.2 /25
Performance: Responses 0.0 /20
49 China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation Limited (Sinopec) Extractives
Total score 4.8 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.2 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.2 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 0.0 /20
Performance: Practices 3.5 /25
Performance: Responses 1.0 /20
50 Devon Energy Extractives
Total score 4.8 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.2 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.0 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 3.0 /20
Performance: Practices 0.7 /25
Performance: Responses 1.0 /20
51 Marathon Oil Extractives
Total score 4.1 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.2 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.5 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 2.0 /20
Performance: Practices 0.7 /25
Performance: Responses 0.8 /20
52 China National Offshore Oil Extractives
Total score 2.7 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.0 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.0 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 1.5 /20
Performance: Practices 0.7 /25
Performance: Responses 0.5 /20
53 Surgutneftegas Extractives
Total score 1.2 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.9 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.0 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 0.0 /20
Performance: Practices 0.0 /25
Performance: Responses 0.2 /20
54 Anhui Conch Cement Extractives
Total score 0.7 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.0 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.0 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 0.0 /20
Performance: Practices 0.7 /25
Performance: Responses 0.0 /20
55 China Energy Investment Group (CHN Energy) Extractives
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and policy commitments 0.0 /10
Embedding respect and human rights due diligence 0.0 /25
Remedies and grievance mechanisms 0.0 /20
Performance: Practices 0.0 /25
Performance: Responses 0.0 /20