Human rights and working conditions

Rank per measurement area

Total score Governance and management of stewardship practices Stewardship of the supply chain Ecosystems Human rights and working conditions Local communities

Ranking overview

30 companies

Total score out of 5 Governance and management of stewardship practices out of 5 Stewardship of the supply chain out of 5 Ecosystems out of 5 Human rights and working conditions out of 5 Local communities out of 5
1 Charoen Pokphand Foods
Total score 2.32 /5
Human rights and working conditions 2.05 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 3.92 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 3.92 /5
Ecosystems 1.58 /5
Human rights and working conditions 2.05 /5
Local communities 0.74 /5
2 Thai Union Group
Total score 2.70 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.92 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 4.59 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 3.30 /5
Ecosystems 2.55 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.92 /5
Local communities 2.05 /5
3 Mitsubishi Corporation
Total score 1.79 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.87 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.63 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 2.10 /5
Ecosystems 1.70 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.87 /5
Local communities 1.43 /5
4 Mowi
Total score 2.42 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.75 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 3.55 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 3.02 /5
Ecosystems 2.46 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.75 /5
Local communities 1.64 /5
5 Nutreco (Skretting)
Total score 2.04 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.66 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 3.71 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 2.59 /5
Ecosystems 1.53 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.66 /5
Local communities 1.95 /5
6 Dongwon Group
Total score 1.17 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.52 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 2.37 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 0.88 /5
Ecosystems 1.01 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.52 /5
Local communities 0.25 /5
7 Marubeni Corporation
Total score 0.87 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.42 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.07 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 0.83 /5
Ecosystems 0.48 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.42 /5
Local communities 0.75 /5
8 Cargill Aqua Nutrition
Total score 1.87 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.19 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 3.15 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 2.91 /5
Ecosystems 1.63 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.19 /5
Local communities 1.08 /5
- Parlevliet & Van der Plas
Total score 1.72 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.19 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 2.17 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.65 /5
Ecosystems 2.26 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.19 /5
Local communities 0.85 /5
- Royal Greenland
Total score 1.33 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.19 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.63 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.72 /5
Ecosystems 1.20 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.19 /5
Local communities 1.08 /5
11 Austevoll Seafood ASA
Total score 1.70 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.05 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 2.20 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.80 /5
Ecosystems 2.20 /5
Human rights and working conditions 1.05 /5
Local communities 0.85 /5
12 BioMar Group
Total score 2.22 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.94 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 3.92 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 3.49 /5
Ecosystems 2.53 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.94 /5
Local communities 0.07 /5
13 Nomad Foods
Total score 1.19 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.80 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 3.40 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.62 /5
Ecosystems 0.83 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.80 /5
Local communities 0.38 /5
14 Maruha Nichiro
Total score 0.83 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.78 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.71 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.11 /5
Ecosystems 0.65 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.78 /5
Local communities 0.13 /5
- Nippon Suisan Kaisha (Nissui)
Total score 1.86 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.78 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 3.71 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 2.08 /5
Ecosystems 2.06 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.78 /5
Local communities 1.59 /5
16 SalMar
Total score 1.50 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.73 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.84 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.70 /5
Ecosystems 2.19 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.73 /5
Local communities 0.25 /5
17 Nueva Pescanova
Total score 1.51 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.72 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 3.30 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 2.47 /5
Ecosystems 1.37 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.72 /5
Local communities 0.25 /5
18 Kyokuyo
Total score 0.76 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.71 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.71 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 0.37 /5
Ecosystems 0.84 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.71 /5
Local communities 0.47 /5
19 Tri Marine Group
Total score 1.19 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.51 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.00 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.05 /5
Ecosystems 2.05 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.51 /5
Local communities 0.32 /5
20 FCF Co., LTD.
Total score 1.53 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.46 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 2.65 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.73 /5
Ecosystems 2.09 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.46 /5
Local communities 0.70 /5
21 Wales Group (Sea Value & Sea Wealth)
Total score 0.34 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.40 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 0.10 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 0.37 /5
Ecosystems 0.45 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.40 /5
Local communities 0.00 /5
22 Bumble Bee Foods
Total score 1.27 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.36 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.50 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 2.04 /5
Ecosystems 1.67 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.36 /5
Local communities 0.38 /5
23 Labeyrie Fine Foods
Total score 1.36 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.29 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.09 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.61 /5
Ecosystems 2.44 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.29 /5
Local communities 0.00 /5
24 High Liner Foods
Total score 0.84 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.23 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 1.54 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.13 /5
Ecosystems 1.09 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.23 /5
Local communities 0.13 /5
25 Cooke
Total score 0.41 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.12 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 0.42 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 0.20 /5
Ecosystems 0.64 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.12 /5
Local communities 0.69 /5
26 Pacific Seafood Group
Total score 0.49 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.08 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 0.25 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 1.29 /5
Ecosystems 0.46 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.08 /5
Local communities 0.25 /5
27 Red Chamber Group
Total score 0.23 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.04 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 0.25 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 0.55 /5
Ecosystems 0.23 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.04 /5
Local communities 0.00 /5
28 Shanghai Fisheries Group Co., LTD.
Total score 0.06 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.00 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 0.10 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 0.00 /5
Ecosystems 0.14 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.00 /5
Local communities 0.00 /5
- Trident Seafoods
Total score 0.23 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.00 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 0.25 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 0.20 /5
Ecosystems 0.41 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.00 /5
Local communities 0.25 /5
- Yokohama Reito (Yokorei)
Total score 0.12 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.00 /5
Governance and management of stewardship practices 0.00 /5
Stewardship of the supply chain 0.27 /5
Ecosystems 0.00 /5
Human rights and working conditions 0.00 /5
Local communities 0.63 /5