Filter per region

Module 2, “Material investment”, assesses actions to reduce scope 1 and 2 emissions from the company’s assets and operations. Comparing the company’s trend in past and projected scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity with its 1.5°C pathway provides a good measure of its transition progress. Comparing capital expenditure (CAPEX) allocated to low-carbon technologies against the total CAPEX provides an indication of future emissions reductions, while locked-in emissions from the company’s assets show the amount by which the company is likely to exceed its carbon budget.

Ranking overview

1 Ørsted
Total score 100.0 /100
Material investment 100.0 /100
2 Energias de Portugal
Total score 86.6 /100
Material investment 86.6 /100
3 Enel
Total score 72.0 /100
Material investment 72.0 /100
4 Tanzania Electric Supply Company
Total score 69.7 /100
Material investment 69.7 /100
5 E.ON
Total score 48.0 /100
Material investment 48.0 /100
6 CMS Energy
Total score 47.8 /100
Material investment 47.8 /100
7 Vattenfall
Total score 44.4 /100
Material investment 44.4 /100
8 SSE
Total score 42.7 /100
Material investment 42.7 /100
9 Kyushu Electric Power
Total score 41.3 /100
Material investment 41.3 /100
10 WEC Energy Group
Total score 40.6 /100
Material investment 40.6 /100
11 Southern Company
Total score 40.1 /100
Material investment 40.1 /100
12 AboitizPower
Total score 38.3 /100
Material investment 38.3 /100
13 ENGIE
Total score 37.0 /100
Material investment 37.0 /100
14 Vistra
Total score 36.6 /100
Material investment 36.6 /100
15 Power Assets
Total score 35.9 /100
Material investment 35.9 /100
16 Origin Energy
Total score 35.7 /100
Material investment 35.7 /100
17 Dominion Energy
Total score 33.8 /100
Material investment 33.8 /100
18 J Power
Total score 29.1 /100
Material investment 29.1 /100
- RWE
Total score 29.1 /100
Material investment 29.1 /100
20 AES
Total score 27.9 /100
Material investment 27.9 /100
- EnBW Company
Total score 27.9 /100
Material investment 27.9 /100
22 Kansai Electric Power
Total score 27.3 /100
Material investment 27.3 /100
- Xcel Energy
Total score 27.3 /100
Material investment 27.3 /100
24 American Electric Power
Total score 27.1 /100
Material investment 27.1 /100
25 Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Total score 25.8 /100
Material investment 25.8 /100
26 Pampa Energia
Total score 24.7 /100
Material investment 24.7 /100
27 Iberdrola
Total score 23.8 /100
Material investment 23.8 /100
28 Nextera Energy
Total score 23.1 /100
Material investment 23.1 /100
29 JSW Energy
Total score 21.9 /100
Material investment 21.9 /100
30 Fortum
Total score 21.8 /100
Material investment 21.8 /100
31 Tata Power
Total score 21.6 /100
Material investment 21.6 /100
32 ČEZ Group
Total score 21.4 /100
Material investment 21.4 /100
33 K-Electric
Total score 19.4 /100
Material investment 19.4 /100
34 Constellation Energy
Total score 18.8 /100
Material investment 18.8 /100
35 Uniper
Total score 18.0 /100
Material investment 18.0 /100
36 CLP Group
Total score 17.9 /100
Material investment 17.9 /100
37 Chubu Electric Power
Total score 17.7 /100
Material investment 17.7 /100
38 Polska Grupa Energetyczna
Total score 16.4 /100
Material investment 16.4 /100
39 PPL
Total score 16.1 /100
Material investment 16.1 /100
40 Korea Electric Power Corporation
Total score 15.5 /100
Material investment 15.5 /100
41 Tokyo Electric Power Company
Total score 15.1 /100
Material investment 15.1 /100
42 Transcorp Power
Total score 15.0 /100
Material investment 15.0 /100
43 Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
Total score 14.9 /100
Material investment 14.9 /100
44 Vietnam Electricity
Total score 14.2 /100
Material investment 14.2 /100
45 State Power Investment Corporation
Total score 13.6 /100
Material investment 13.6 /100
46 Électricité de France
Total score 12.9 /100
Material investment 12.9 /100
47 Tenaga Nasional
Total score 12.5 /100
Material investment 12.5 /100
48 Inter RAO
Total score 12.4 /100
Material investment 12.4 /100
49 Taipower
Total score 12.0 /100
Material investment 12.0 /100
50 NRG Energy
Total score 10.4 /100
Material investment 10.4 /100
51 Comisión Federal de Electricidad
Total score 9.2 /100
Material investment 9.2 /100
52 Tohoku Electric Power
Total score 9.1 /100
Material investment 9.1 /100
53 Duke Energy
Total score 7.9 /100
Material investment 7.9 /100
54 NTPC
Total score 7.7 /100
Material investment 7.7 /100
55 Saudi Electricity Company
Total score 7.0 /100
Material investment 7.0 /100
56 Chugoku Electric Power
Total score 6.4 /100
Material investment 6.4 /100
57 AGL Energy
Total score 4.5 /100
Material investment 4.5 /100
58 Egyptian Electricity Holding Company
Total score 4.4 /100
Material investment 4.4 /100
59 Qatar Electricity and Water Company
Total score 4.3 /100
Material investment 4.3 /100
60 China Huaneng
Total score 4.0 /100
Material investment 4.0 /100
61 Eskom
Total score 2.8 /100
Material investment 2.8 /100
62 China Huadian
Total score 2.5 /100
Material investment 2.5 /100
- Mahagenco
Total score 2.5 /100
Material investment 2.5 /100
64 China Datang
Total score 2.1 /100
Material investment 2.1 /100
65 Eletrobras
Total score 1.7 /100
Material investment 1.7 /100
66 CHN Energy
Total score 1.1 /100
Material investment 1.1 /100
67 Pacific Gas and Electric
Total score 0.3 /100
Material investment 0.3 /100
68 China Three Gorges
Total score 0.0 /100
Material investment 0.0 /100