

2021 Electric Utilities Benchmark
Measuring the 50 most influential companies on their progress to 1.5°C

We have assessed the 50 most globally influential electric utility companies on their alignment to a low-carbon world and compared the results against our 2020 Benchmark findings.
The ambition of the scenario used for these 2021 assessments has increased: in 2020, we assessed companies against a pathway built on the International Energy Agency (IEA) B2DS (Beyond 2°C) Scenario, and in 2021, against an IEA Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario (1.5°C) pathway.

Four key findings
See below the four key findings from the benchmark results, including comparison against previous findings, as well as a deeper dive into findings across each performance module assessed. The Electric Utilities Benchmark 2021 shows evidence of improvements in the low-carbon performance of some of the companies and one company clearly leading with an ACT rating of 18.5A+.
Nonetheless, it is clear that companies on the whole are not yet transitioning sufficiently to align with a 1.5°C world, even in this sector which has the technology available to decarbonise. These companies should look to good practice of their peers in stronger leadership, more investment into a low carbon future and greater transparency to scale the low-carbon ambition and performance gap that exists in the sector.

State of decarbonisation in the electric utilities sector disappointingly low
The electric utilities sector started decarbonising before all others, which means it has the most advanced and mature technologies for the low-carbon transition and acts as the enabler for other sectors to decarbonize. However, the sector itself is a long way from keeping within the goal of 1.5°C. WBA’s second benchmark for this sector evidences the low-carbon performance of 70% of the assessed companies is expected to worsen in the near future. Persistent fossil fuel reliance for electricity generation indicates that 98% of companies are expected to exceed their carbon budgets by 2035.

Companies’ targeted emissions reduction falls short of the 1.5C goal
Targets of electric utility companies to reduce emissions are falling short of the 1.5°C goal. While we see that nearly half the companies have improved target ambition and disclosure since the 2020 benchmark, 47 of the 50 companies assessed have not aligned their targets with their 1.5°C pathway. Our assessments also evidence that the majority of companies’ low-carbon plans remain inadequate to bring about a rapid transition to low-carbon electricity generation.

Lack of disclosure on power generation CapEx limits sector’s progress on the benchmark
Increasing investment, research and development (R&D) into low-carbon technologies, and scaling new business models is vital to enable the sector’s decarbonisation. To be fully aligned with a 1.5°C pathway, companies must be spending over 78% of their generation capital expenditure (CapEx) on low-carbon power generation. The 2021 benchmark forecasts that 40% of the assessed companies that have disclosed data on their power generation CapEx, are likely to be spending over this level by 2023. This progress, however, is compromised by the overall lack of CapEx disclosure by many companies and the continued investment and reliance on fossil fuels by large state-owned companies in particular.

Electric utilities are making efforts for a just transition, but have room for improvement
The global transition to a well-functioning low-carbon economy can only be successful if it is socially just – that is, if the people at the heart of the current carbon-intensive systems are identified and engaged as agents of change. The 50 keystone electric utilities assessed in the benchmark were also evaluated in WBA’s 2021 pilot Just Transition Assessment. The results show that they are on average more advanced than the oil and gas and automotive companies in working towards a just transition. However, there is still wide disparity between the efforts and considerable room for improvement.

Find out the performance of the electric utility companies
View rankingFurther reading
-
Insights Report
This report builds on the above mentioned key findings and module level summaries in detail and dives further into the results of the benchmark.
See report here -
Data, scores and additional commentary
Access the 2021 data sheet, which compiles module and indicator scoring and details regarding companies’ engagement with the data validation process and data availability. It also contains an explanation of each company's score for each module. This additional commentary is designed to be read alongside each online company scorecard.
See datasheet here -
ACT and WBA - Technical FAQs
These FAQs' explain technical aspects of how the ACT methodologies are used to assess companies in high emitting sectors and create WBA's Climate and Energy Benchmark.
See FAQs here
The 50 keystone electric utility companies
Click the map to explore each company, depending on the region you would like to learn about and the location of headquarters
Locations
-
Title: Iberdrola
Place: Bilbao, Spain
Description: -
Title: Inter RAO
Place: Moscow, Russian Federation
Description: -
Title: Kansai Electric Power Company (KEPCO)
Place: Osaka, Japan
Description: -
Title: Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO/Hanjeon)
Place: Naju-si, Republic of Korea
Description: -
Title: Kyushu Electric Power
Place: Fukuoka, Japan
Description: -
Title: Nextera Energy
Place: Juno Beach, Florida, United States of America
Description: -
Title: NTPC
Place: New Delhi, India
Description: -
Title: Origin Energy
Place: Sydney, Australia
Description: -
Title: Ørsted
Place: Fredericia, Denmark
Description: -
Title: Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)
Place: San Francisco, California, United States of America
Description: -
Title: Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN)
Place: Jakarta, Indonesia
Description: -
Title: RWE
Place: Essen, Germany
Description: -
Title: Saudi Electricity Company (SEC)
Place: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Description: -
Title: Southern Co
Place: Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Description: -
Title: SSE
Place: Perth, United Kingdom
Description: -
Title: State Power Investment Corporation (SPIC) (国家电力投资集团)
Place: Beijing, China
Description: -
Title: Taiwan Power Company (台灣電力公司)
Place: Taipei City, Taiwan, China
Description: -
Title: Tenaga Nasional
Place: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Description: -
Title: Tohoku Electric Power
Place: Sendai, Japan
Description: -
Title: Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)
Place: Tokyo, Japan
Description: -
Title: Vattenfall
Place: Solna, Sweden
Description: -
Title: Vistra Energy Corp
Place: Irving, Texas, United States of America
Description: -
Title: Xcel Energy
Place: Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
Description: -
Title: AES Corporation
Place: Arlington, Virginia, United States of America
Description: -
Title: AGL Energy
Place: Sydney, Australia
Description: -
Title: American Electric Power (AEP)
Place: Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
Description: -
Title: CEZ Group
Place: Prague, Czech Republic
Description: -
Title: China Datang Corp (中国大唐集团)
Place: Beijing, China
Description: -
Title: China Energy Investment Group (CHN Energy) (国家能源投资集团)
Place: Beijing, China
Description: -
Title: China Huadian Corporation (中国华电集团)
Place: Beijing, China
Description: -
Title: China Huaneng Group (中国华能集团)
Place: Beijing, China
Description: -
Title: China Three Gorges (中国长江三峡集团)
Place: Beijing, China
Description: -
Title: Chubu Electric Power
Place: Nagoya, Japan
Description: -
Title: Chugoku Electric Power Company
Place: Hiroshima, Japan
Description: -
Title: CLP Holdings (中電集團)
Place: Hong Kong, China
Description: -
Title: Comision Federal de Electricidad (CFE)
Place: Mexico City, Mexico
Description: -
Title: Dominion Energy
Place: Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
Description: -
Title: Duke Energy
Place: Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America
Description: -
Title: E.ON
Place: Essen, Germany
Description: -
Title: EDP Energias de Portugal
Place: Lisbon, Portugal
Description: -
Title: Egyptian Electricity Holding Company (EEHC)
Place: Cairo, Egypt
Description: -
Title: Électricité de France (EDF)
Place: Paris, France
Description: -
Title: Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
Place: Nonthaburi, Thailand
Description: -
Title: Eletrobras
Place: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Description: -
Title: EnBW Energie Baden-Wuerttemberg
Place: Karlsruhe, Germany
Description: -
Title: Enel
Place: Rome, Italy
Description: -
Title: ENGIE
Place: Paris, France
Description: -
Title: Eskom Holdings
Place: Sunninghill, South Africa
Description: -
Title: Exelon Corporation
Place: Chicago, United States of America
Description: -
Title: Fortum
Place: Espoo, Finland
Description:
Previous findings
-
2020 benchmark results
In 2020, we launched our first iteration of the Electric Utilities Benchmark, which measured the progress of 50 keystone companies in the sector towards the goals of the Paris Agreement.
See 2020 findings