Filter per region

Module 2, “Material investment”, assesses actions to reduce scope 1 and 2 emissions from the company’s assets and operations. Comparing the company’s trend in past and projected scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity with its 1.5°C pathway provides a good measure of its transition progress. Comparing capital expenditure (CAPEX) allocated to low-carbon technologies against the total CAPEX provides an indication of future emissions reductions, while locked-in emissions from the company’s assets show the amount by which the company is likely to exceed its carbon budget.

Ranking overview

1 Siemens Gamesa
Total score 100.0 /100
Material investment 100.0 /100
- Vestas
Total score 100.0 /100
Material investment 100.0 /100
3 Schneider Electric
Total score 62.5 /100
Material investment 62.5 /100
4 ABB
Total score 50.0 /100
Material investment 50.0 /100
- Eaton
Total score 50.0 /100
Material investment 50.0 /100
- First Solar
Total score 50.0 /100
Material investment 50.0 /100
- General Electric
Total score 50.0 /100
Material investment 50.0 /100
- Honeywell
Total score 50.0 /100
Material investment 50.0 /100
9 Canadian Solar
Total score 0.0 /100
Material investment 0.0 /100
- Goldwind
Total score 0.0 /100
Material investment 0.0 /100
- Trina Solar
Total score 0.0 /100
Material investment 0.0 /100