Filter per region

Companies included in the agricultural inputs segment are active in the manufacturing and sales of fertilisers or agrochemical products, breeding and sales of seeds or manufacturing of agricultural machinery and equipment. They supply farmers with products and services needed to grow their crops and business.

The agricultural inputs segment includes 54 companies who, with their farmer-centric business models, are situated at the beginning of the food value chain. As such, their impact on the production of food is vital. While noting a more indirect impact on nutrition, through improving access to agricultural inputs as well as partnerships in- and outside the sector, companies in this segment are key to enhancing global food security.

Moroccan company OCP ranks number one in this segment, where it outperforms its peers as a result of a wide range of targets and commitments across all measurement areas. It is followed by a group of seed companies, UPL, Olam International, Bayer, Wilmar and Syngenta Group, who demonstrate leading practices in enhancing farmer productivity and resilience. BASF (ranking seventh), Yara (ranking eight), CNH Industrial (ranking ninth) and Charoen Pokphand Group (ranking tenth), are the other companies making up the top ten. Mid-range are companies in all three industries, with machinery companies Mahindra and Mahindra and AGCO ranking 19th and 25th respectively. While many of the companies in this segment operate out of the spotlight, compared to companies in further downstream segments, most provide some disclosure on key sustainable development issues. Companies at the lower end of the ranking generally lack sustainability strategies and targets, demonstrating significant room for improvement. For instance, while 20 companies in this segment demonstrate commitments towards improving soil health and agrobiodiversity, only eight have translated this into setting targets or providing quantitative evidence. Similarly, disclosure around social inclusion topics is fairly low with 60% of companies yet to provide sufficient commitments towards eliminating child labour.

Ranking table

Total score out of 100 Governance and strategy out of 100 Environment out of 100 Nutrition out of 100 Social inclusion out of 100
1 OCP
Total score 56.8 /100
Governance and strategy 75.0 /100
Environment 62.7 /100
Nutrition 50.0 /100
Social inclusion 52.0 /100
2 UPL
Total score 45.4 /100
Governance and strategy 58.0 /100
Environment 39.3 /100
Nutrition 50.0 /100
Social inclusion 42.3 /100
3 Olam International
Total score 43.4 /100
Governance and strategy 67.0 /100
Environment 34.0 /100
Nutrition 37.7 /100
Social inclusion 50.7 /100
4 Bayer
Total score 42.4 /100
Governance and strategy 67.0 /100
Environment 47.0 /100
Nutrition 33.3 /100
Social inclusion 39.0 /100
5 Syngenta Group
Total score 42.2 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Environment 57.0 /100
Nutrition 33.3 /100
Social inclusion 33.7 /100
- Wilmar International
Total score 42.2 /100
Governance and strategy 67.0 /100
Environment 22.7 /100
Nutrition 33.3 /100
Social inclusion 62.3 /100
7 BASF
Total score 40.9 /100
Governance and strategy 58.0 /100
Environment 37.7 /100
Nutrition 41.7 /100
Social inclusion 37.7 /100
8 Yara
Total score 39.8 /100
Governance and strategy 67.0 /100
Environment 29.3 /100
Nutrition 33.3 /100
Social inclusion 47.7 /100
9 CNH Industrial
Total score 38.5 /100
Governance and strategy 67.0 /100
Environment 43.0 /100
Nutrition 25.0 /100
Social inclusion 38.3 /100
10 Charoen Pokphand Group
Total score 35.2 /100
Governance and strategy 75.0 /100
Environment 31.3 /100
Nutrition 21.0 /100
Social inclusion 40.3 /100
11 Sumitomo Chemical
Total score 34.8 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Environment 39.3 /100
Nutrition 33.3 /100
Social inclusion 26.7 /100
12 Nutrien
Total score 33.4 /100
Governance and strategy 67.0 /100
Environment 41.7 /100
Nutrition 16.7 /100
Social inclusion 30.7 /100
13 Corteva Agriscience
Total score 33.1 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Environment 43.0 /100
Nutrition 33.3 /100
Social inclusion 17.3 /100
14 Deere & Co
Total score 32.7 /100
Governance and strategy 42.0 /100
Environment 53.7 /100
Nutrition 16.7 /100
Social inclusion 25.0 /100
15 ICL
Total score 32.3 /100
Governance and strategy 42.0 /100
Environment 33.3 /100
Nutrition 33.3 /100
Social inclusion 27.3 /100
16 PhosAgro
Total score 30.9 /100
Governance and strategy 42.0 /100
Environment 33.3 /100
Nutrition 33.3 /100
Social inclusion 22.3 /100
17 BayWa
Total score 30.5 /100
Governance and strategy 58.0 /100
Environment 31.3 /100
Nutrition 25.0 /100
Social inclusion 26.0 /100
18 Mosaic
Total score 30.0 /100
Governance and strategy 58.0 /100
Environment 37.7 /100
Nutrition 16.7 /100
Social inclusion 26.3 /100
19 Mahindra and Mahindra
Total score 28.8 /100
Governance and strategy 33.0 /100
Environment 25.0 /100
Nutrition 33.3 /100
Social inclusion 26.7 /100
20 CF Industries
Total score 26.6 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Environment 29.3 /100
Nutrition 16.7 /100
Social inclusion 26.0 /100
- Groupe Limagrain
Total score 26.6 /100
Governance and strategy 25.0 /100
Environment 21.3 /100
Nutrition 41.7 /100
Social inclusion 17.3 /100
22 FMC
Total score 25.8 /100
Governance and strategy 42.0 /100
Environment 37.7 /100
Nutrition 8.3 /100
Social inclusion 26.0 /100
23 Kubota
Total score 24.3 /100
Governance and strategy 25.0 /100
Environment 39.3 /100
Nutrition 16.7 /100
Social inclusion 16.7 /100
24 Mitsui
Total score 23.8 /100
Governance and strategy 33.0 /100
Environment 21.0 /100
Nutrition 8.3 /100
Social inclusion 39.0 /100
25 AGCO
Total score 19.9 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Environment 18.0 /100
Nutrition 8.3 /100
Social inclusion 23.3 /100
26 Sociedad Quimica y Minera (SQM)
Total score 19.8 /100
Governance and strategy 58.0 /100
Environment 4.3 /100
Nutrition 8.3 /100
Social inclusion 34.0 /100
27 K+S
Total score 18.7 /100
Governance and strategy 58.0 /100
Environment 16.7 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 26.0 /100
28 Mitsubishi Corporation
Total score 18.5 /100
Governance and strategy 33.0 /100
Environment 23.0 /100
Nutrition 8.3 /100
Social inclusion 19.3 /100
29 Amaggi Group
Total score 18.3 /100
Governance and strategy 33.0 /100
Environment 18.7 /100
Nutrition 6.3 /100
Social inclusion 24.7 /100
30 Louis Dreyfus Company
Total score 18.0 /100
Governance and strategy 33.0 /100
Environment 25.0 /100
Nutrition 6.3 /100
Social inclusion 17.3 /100
31 Nufarm
Total score 15.7 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Environment 12.7 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 23.0 /100
32 Marubeni Corporation
Total score 14.9 /100
Governance and strategy 42.0 /100
Environment 12.7 /100
Nutrition 4.3 /100
Social inclusion 19.0 /100
33 KWS
Total score 13.5 /100
Governance and strategy 42.0 /100
Environment 7.0 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 24.0 /100
34 Iseki
Total score 13.3 /100
Governance and strategy 42.0 /100
Environment 7.0 /100
Nutrition 16.7 /100
Social inclusion 6.7 /100
35 Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative (IFFCO)
Total score 12.6 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Environment 14.3 /100
Nutrition 25.0 /100
Social inclusion 2.7 /100
36 EuroChem
Total score 11.3 /100
Governance and strategy 25.0 /100
Environment 12.7 /100
Nutrition 8.3 /100
Social inclusion 8.3 /100
37 DLG Group
Total score 10.9 /100
Governance and strategy 17.0 /100
Environment 16.7 /100
Nutrition 6.3 /100
Social inclusion 7.7 /100
- Land O'Lakes
Total score 10.9 /100
Governance and strategy 8.0 /100
Environment 6.7 /100
Nutrition 4.3 /100
Social inclusion 22.3 /100
39 Danish Agro
Total score 10.3 /100
Governance and strategy 17.0 /100
Environment 4.7 /100
Nutrition 12.7 /100
Social inclusion 11.7 /100
40 Union Invivo
Total score 9.5 /100
Governance and strategy 33.0 /100
Environment 18.0 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 2.7 /100
41 J.R. Simplot
Total score 8.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Environment 6.3 /100
Nutrition 4.3 /100
Social inclusion 16.3 /100
42 CHS
Total score 7.6 /100
Governance and strategy 8.0 /100
Environment 6.3 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 16.3 /100
43 Sinomach (YTO Group)
Total score 7.4 /100
Governance and strategy 42.0 /100
Environment 10.7 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 0.0 /100
44 Claas
Total score 6.3 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Environment 14.3 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 6.7 /100
45 Wilbur-Ellis
Total score 6.0 /100
Governance and strategy 17.0 /100
Environment 8.3 /100
Nutrition 6.3 /100
Social inclusion 0.0 /100
46 Murugappa Group (Coromandel, EID Parry, Parry Agro)
Total score 5.6 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Environment 7.0 /100
Nutrition 8.3 /100
Social inclusion 3.3 /100
47 JCB
Total score 5.5 /100
Governance and strategy 8.0 /100
Environment 7.0 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 8.3 /100
- ZEN-NOH
Total score 5.5 /100
Governance and strategy 8.0 /100
Environment 6.7 /100
Nutrition 4.3 /100
Social inclusion 4.3 /100
49 Yanmar
Total score 4.4 /100
Governance and strategy 8.0 /100
Environment 3.7 /100
Nutrition 8.3 /100
Social inclusion 0.0 /100
50 SDF Group
Total score 2.6 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Environment 7.0 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 1.7 /100
51 Lovol
Total score 0.5 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Environment 0.0 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 1.7 /100
- Southern States Cooperative
Total score 0.5 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Environment 0.0 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 1.7 /100
53 National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (NongHyup Agribusiness Group)
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Environment 0.0 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 0.0 /100
- Wengfu Group
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Environment 0.0 /100
Nutrition 0.0 /100
Social inclusion 0.0 /100