Policy engagement

Rank by score

Total score ACT Core social indicators Just transition

Rank by module

Filter per region

Filter per active subsector

Module 8, Policy engagement, assesses how companies interact with trade associations, which are a key instrument to drive sectoral climate ambition policy. Companies’ support for significant climate policies is also taken into account.

Ranking overview

1 New World Development
Total score 76.0 /100
Policy engagement 76.0 /100
2 Gecina
Total score 70.0 /100
Policy engagement 70.0 /100
3 Prologis
Total score 66.0 /100
Policy engagement 66.0 /100
4 Hyundai Engineering and Construction
Total score 64.0 /100
Policy engagement 64.0 /100
- Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL)
Total score 64.0 /100
Policy engagement 64.0 /100
- Simon Property Group
Total score 64.0 /100
Policy engagement 64.0 /100
- Sun Hung Kai Properties
Total score 64.0 /100
Policy engagement 64.0 /100
8 Mitsubishi Estate
Total score 62.0 /100
Policy engagement 62.0 /100
9 Ayala Land
Total score 58.0 /100
Policy engagement 58.0 /100
- Sumitomo Realty & Development
Total score 58.0 /100
Policy engagement 58.0 /100
- Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield SE
Total score 58.0 /100
Policy engagement 58.0 /100
12 Avalonbay Communities
Total score 54.0 /100
Policy engagement 54.0 /100
13 China Overseas Land & Investment
Total score 52.0 /100
Policy engagement 52.0 /100
- Even Construtora
Total score 52.0 /100
Policy engagement 52.0 /100
- LEG Immobilien SE
Total score 52.0 /100
Policy engagement 52.0 /100
- Macrotech Developers Ltd
Total score 52.0 /100
Policy engagement 52.0 /100
- Vonovia SE
Total score 52.0 /100
Policy engagement 52.0 /100
18 Redefine Properties Ltd
Total score 48.0 /100
Policy engagement 48.0 /100
19 Cyrela Brazil Realty
Total score 46.0 /100
Policy engagement 46.0 /100
- SEGRO PLC
Total score 46.0 /100
Policy engagement 46.0 /100
- Sagax AB
Total score 46.0 /100
Policy engagement 46.0 /100
- Yango Group
Total score 46.0 /100
Policy engagement 46.0 /100
23 CBRE Group
Total score 38.0 /100
Policy engagement 38.0 /100
24 China Poly Group
Total score 32.0 /100
Policy engagement 32.0 /100
- Longfor Group Holdings
Total score 32.0 /100
Policy engagement 32.0 /100
- MRV Engenharia
Total score 32.0 /100
Policy engagement 32.0 /100
- Mitsui Fudosan
Total score 32.0 /100
Policy engagement 32.0 /100
- Seazen Holding
Total score 32.0 /100
Policy engagement 32.0 /100
29 China Evergrande Group
Total score 26.0 /100
Policy engagement 26.0 /100
- China Resources Land
Total score 26.0 /100
Policy engagement 26.0 /100
- Country Garden Holdings
Total score 26.0 /100
Policy engagement 26.0 /100
- Gemdale
Total score 26.0 /100
Policy engagement 26.0 /100
- Jiangsu Zhongnan Construction Group
Total score 26.0 /100
Policy engagement 26.0 /100
- Palm Hills Development
Total score 26.0 /100
Policy engagement 26.0 /100
- Welltower
Total score 26.0 /100
Policy engagement 26.0 /100
- Wheelock and Co
Total score 26.0 /100
Policy engagement 26.0 /100
37 Brookfields Corporation
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy engagement 20.0 /100
38 CK Asset Holdings
Total score 18.0 /100
Policy engagement 18.0 /100
- Emaar Properties
Total score 18.0 /100
Policy engagement 18.0 /100
40 Godrej Properties
Total score 16.0 /100
Policy engagement 16.0 /100
41 CIFI Holdings
Total score 12.0 /100
Policy engagement 12.0 /100
- Jinke Property Group
Total score 12.0 /100
Policy engagement 12.0 /100
- LendLease Group
Total score 12.0 /100
Policy engagement 12.0 /100
44 China Merchants Shekou Industrial Zone Holdings
Total score 6.0 /100
Policy engagement 6.0 /100
45 Cushman & Wakefield
Total score 6.0 /100
Policy engagement 6.0 /100
- Greenland Holdings
Total score 6.0 /100
Policy engagement 6.0 /100
- IRSA
Total score 6.0 /100
Policy engagement 6.0 /100
- Qatari Diar
Total score 6.0 /100
Policy engagement 6.0 /100
- RiseSun Real Estate Development
Total score 6.0 /100
Policy engagement 6.0 /100
50 Greentown China Holdings
Total score 0.0 /100
Policy engagement 0.0 /100