Filter per region

The 400 companies assessed in the 2022 Nature Benchmark include some of the most ecologically impactful sectors. The ranking encompasses publicly listed, privately held and state-owned enterprises. In terms of industries, they contain apparel and footwear, chemicals, construction and engineering, construction materials and supplies, containers and packaging, metals and mining, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, and tyres and rubber. The benchmark looks along entire value chains and cross-industry to provide a snapshot of system-level progress.

Ranking table

Total score out of 100 Governance and strategy out of 100 Ecosystems and biodiversity out of 100 Social inclusion and community impact out of 100
1 Mondi Containers and packaging
Total score 42.1 /100
Governance and strategy 61.2 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 43.7 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 31.8 /100
2 Berry Global Containers and packaging
Total score 28.0 /100
Governance and strategy 35.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 25.9 /100
3 Smurfit Kappa Group Containers and packaging
Total score 27.6 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 27.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 23.4 /100
4 DS Smith Containers and packaging
Total score 23.1 /100
Governance and strategy 23.7 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 23.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 22.3 /100
5 Avery Dennison Corporation Containers and packaging
Total score 21.1 /100
Governance and strategy 25.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 21.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.3 /100
6 Graphic Packaging International Containers and packaging
Total score 20.4 /100
Governance and strategy 41.2 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 16.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 17.4 /100
7 International Paper Containers and packaging
Total score 19.1 /100
Governance and strategy 50.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 11.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 19.3 /100
8 WestRock Containers and packaging
Total score 18.9 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 18.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 14.9 /100
9 Toyo Seikan Containers and packaging
Total score 18.7 /100
Governance and strategy 25.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 11.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 26.8 /100
10 Ball Corporation Containers and packaging
Total score 15.2 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 12.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 24.9 /100
- Packaging Corporation of America (PCA) Containers and packaging
Total score 15.2 /100
Governance and strategy 23.7 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 14.9 /100
12 Sealed Air Containers and packaging
Total score 14.6 /100
Governance and strategy 18.7 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 14.9 /100
13 Crown Holdings Containers and packaging
Total score 14.2 /100
Governance and strategy 12.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 12.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 17.9 /100
14 Amcor Containers and packaging
Total score 14.0 /100
Governance and strategy 30.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 10.4 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 13.4 /100
- Ardagh Group Containers and packaging
Total score 14.0 /100
Governance and strategy 23.7 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 11.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 13.4 /100
- Pactiv Evergreen Containers and packaging
Total score 14.0 /100
Governance and strategy 11.2 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 15.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 13.4 /100
17 O-I Containers and packaging
Total score 13.6 /100
Governance and strategy 23.7 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.1 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 10.4 /100
18 Nine Dragons Paper Containers and packaging
Total score 12.1 /100
Governance and strategy 23.7 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 13.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 4.5 /100
19 China International Marine Containers (Group) Containers and packaging
Total score 12.0 /100
Governance and strategy 40.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 12.5 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100
20 Alpla Containers and packaging
Total score 11.2 /100
Governance and strategy 12.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 9.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 14.0 /100
21 Nampak Containers and packaging
Total score 9.6 /100
Governance and strategy 21.2 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 3.2 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 14.9 /100
22 Shanghai Zijiang Enterprise Group  Containers and packaging
Total score 8.6 /100
Governance and strategy 27.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 9.3 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100
- ShenZhen YUTO Packaging Technology Containers and packaging
Total score 8.6 /100
Governance and strategy 28.7 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.9 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 1.5 /100
24 Uflex Containers and packaging
Total score 8.5 /100
Governance and strategy 22.5 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 6.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 6.0 /100
25 Tetra Laval Containers and packaging
Total score 4.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 7.6 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100
26 Kangde Xin Composite Material Group  Containers and packaging
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /100
Ecosystems and biodiversity 0.0 /100
Social inclusion and community impact 0.0 /100