Skip to main content

Scoring Approach

All benchmark results of all 2,000 companies will be published at once for the first time in early 2026 and every two years thereafter.

To ensure our benchmarks are both meaningful and impactful, we have introduced a simplified and harmonised scoring approach. This new approach reflects our commitment to transparency, consistency, and inclusivity, ensuring that stakeholders can easily understand, and replicate our scoring methods.

WBA's new scoring approach is designed to be clear, consistent, and applicable across all our benchmarks. It brings several key enhancements:

Simplicity and consistency
  • Unified scoring scale: Scores are normalised on a 0-100 scale at both the measurement area and total score levels, with indicators scored between 0 and 1.
  • Binary element assessment: Each element within an indicator is assessed on a simple 0 (unmet) or 1 (met) basis, eliminating partial scores and making our evaluations straightforward and transparent.
Efficiency and replicability
  • Equal weighting principle: All indicators within a measurement area are weighted equally, and all elements within an indicator carry the same weight. This consistency ensures the scoring process is comparable and consistent across different benchmarks.
  • Automated scoring: By simplifying the scoring structure, we enable automated calculations across benchmarks, improving efficiency and reducing the potential for manual errors.
Enhanced impact
  • Improved comparability: The new approach enhances the comparability of data across the SDG2000, empowering stakeholders to make more informed decisions.
  • Non-applicability with rationale: For cases where certain indicators or elements are not applicable to a company, clear guidelines ensure that these exceptions are handled consistently without penalizing the company.
  • Bespoke Measurement Area weights: Measurement Area weights are based on the transformation’s narrative.

Overview

Note: If an element is not applicable to a company, the weight of that element is distributed equally across the applicable elements of the indicator. Similarly, if an indicator is not applicable to a company, the weight will be redistributed across all applicable indicators within the respective MA.

Non-applicability is avoided where possible. If non-applicability is applied, a clear rationale is stated.

Applied Example

This example shows how a company’s performance is evaluated according to our scoring approach. Chosen numbers are illustrative to produce a simplified calculation example.

Example benchmark structure: Company A is assessed against Benchmark B

Measurement Areas:

  • Benchmark B is comprised of two Measurement Areas (MA): MA1, MA2
  • MA1: Weight = 40%
  • MA2: Weight = 60%

Indicators:

  • MA1 has four indicators: I1, I2, I3, I4
  • MA2 has five indicators
  • All indicators are equally weighted within a measurement area

Elements:

  • Each indicator comprises of several elements
  • Elements are assigned a score of 0 (unmet) or 1 (met) depending on whether Company A meets the element criteria
  • All elements are equally weighted within an indicator

Scoring calculations:

Indicator score:

  • The indicator score is calculated as the average of all element scores within each respective indicator
    • Indicator 1 (I1) has four elements. Company A meets the first, third and fourth elements. The second element is unmet.
    • Indicator 2 (I2) has three elements. Company A meets the second and third elements. The first element is unmet.
  • Indicator score = Sum of element scores / Number of elements
    • I1 = (1+0+1+1)/4 = 3/4
    • I2 = (0+1+1)/3= 2/3

Measurement Area score:

  • The Measurement Area score is the average of the indicator scores multiplied by 100
  • Measurement Area score = (Sum of indicator scores / Number of indicators) * 100
    • MA1 = (3/4 (I1) + 2/3 (I2) + 1 + 1/2)/4 * 100 = 72.9
    • MA2 = (1 + 1/2 + 1/5 + 1/2 + 3/5)/5 * 100 = 56.0

Total score:

  • The total score for Company A is the weighted mean of all MA scores.
  • Total score = (MA1 score * weight of MA1) + (MA2 score * weight of MA2)
    • Total score = (72.9 * 40%)+ (56.0 * 60%) = 29.2 + 33.6 = 62.8
Benchmark Methodologies
Open filters
Close filters
Topic
Benchmark
Region
Industry
buildings-construction-singapore
Consultation for the ACT Buildings Sector Methodology
Methodology
ACT Core
extractives-workers_WEB-rotated
The Methodologies for the 2026 Climate Benchmark
Methodology
ACT Core
Just Transition
three_high_rise_buildings
The Methodology for the 2026 Urban Benchmark
Methodology
Urban Benchmark
boy_laptop_grandma_outside_access_technology-scaled
The Methodology for the 2026 Digital Inclusion Benchmark
Methodology
Digital Inclusion Benchmark
two-fish-workers-and-nets-scaled
The Methodology for the 2026 Ocean Benchmark
Methodology
Ocean Benchmark
The Methodologies for the Corporate Human Rights Benchmarks (2020-2024)
Methodology
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark
solar-panel
2024 ACT Framework
Methodology
ACT Core
man_mining_for_gold_WEB
The Methodology for the 2026 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark
Methodology
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark
worker_sugarcane_fields_WEB
The Methodology for the 2026 Social Benchmark
Methodology
Social Benchmark
woman_working_on_field_whilst_carrying_infant_WEB
The Methodology for the 2026 Gender Benchmark
Methodology
Gender Benchmark
people_with_phones
Scoring approach for 2026 benchmarks
Methodology
sugar_cane_farmer_tractor_south_asia
The Methodology for the 2026 Food and Agriculture Benchmark
Methodology
Food and Agriculture Benchmark
Women_working_pollen
The Methodology for the 2026 Nature Benchmark
Methodology
Nature Benchmark
The Methodologies for the Climate and Energy Benchmarks (2020-2024)
Methodology
ACT Core
The Methodologies for the Financial System Benchmarks (2022-2025)
Methodology
Financial System Benchmark
urban_city_highrise_bridge
The Methodology for the 2024 Urban Benchmark
Methodology
Urban Benchmark
The Methodologies for the Gender Benchmarks (2020-2023)
Methodology
Gender Benchmark
1 2

Download the Scoring Approach

The WBA scoring approach is available in both English and Japanese, with thanks to CRT Japan for the latter translation.

Download (English) Download (日本語)

Subscribe to stay informed on our work

Keep up to date with all the latest from World Benchmarking Alliance

Join our newsletter