Cemros

No leading practices were identified for this company.

No leading practices were identified for this company.

No leading practices were identified for this company.

No leading practices were identified for this company.

The company’s lack of clear emissions reduction targets and undisclosed emissions data pose significant risks, including regulatory challenges and stakeholder scrutiny. Cemros also fails to provide information on its use of alternative fuels or the emissions intensity of its purchased clinker. This opacity clouds the visibility of its environmental performance and may hinder its ability to attract environmentally conscious investors and partners.

Cemros’ approach to decarbonisation reveals significant risks and missed opportunities. The company lacks public disclosure of whether it has board-level oversight of its climate strategy, climate expertise and a detailed low-carbon transition plan aligned with a 1.5°C pathway, which indicates potential governance and strategic planning vulnerabilities. Further, the company’s lack of climate scenario analysis and disclosure of revenue from low-carbon products underscore risks to its adaptability and market positioning.

Cemros does not disclose its research and development (R&D) expenditure, investment in low-carbon technologies and its operational measures to reduce its environmental impact. This lack of transparency can lead to missed opportunities in leveraging emerging technologies and may impede the company’s transition to a low-carbon economy.

Cemros lacks transparency on its supplier and client engagement strategies, as well as its membership in trade associations. This opacity hinders the company’s ability to demonstrate its commitment to sustainable practices and climate-aligned activities, potentially affecting stakeholder trust and business relationships, and limiting Cemros’ influence in shaping sustainable industry standards.

Cemros has acknowledged the importance of addressing climate change but has not set specific emissions reduction targets or disclosed plans for a low-carbon transition.

Cemros’ lack of publicly available information on its climate strategy, emissions reduction efforts and engagement policies suggests a lack of commitment to aligning with the Paris Agreement goals, even though the company acknowledges the significance of climate change.

Cemros has not disclosed its past emissions intensities, total emissions or the actions it has taken to address climate change, creating a major gap in evaluating its environmental progress.

Currently, Cemros does not demonstrate any activities or data.

Cemros does not disclose a low-carbon transition plan, its R&D expenditure and investment in low-carbon technologies, or its strategies to decrease emissions and electricity consumption.

No evidence was found of the company’s commitment to social dialogue or of the categories of stakeholders the company engages with on a just transition. Furthermore, no evidence was found to demonstrate the company’s ongoing social dialogue and meaningful engagement with affected stakeholders.
No evidence was found of the company undertaking low-carbon transition planning to mitigate the social impacts of the transition on workers, affected stakeholders and its business relationships. Additionally, no evidence was found to demonstrate the company’s engagement in social dialogue and with stakeholders in its just transition planning.

No public commitment by the company was found stating its intention to create and support access to green and decent jobs as part of the low-carbon transition. Moreover, no evidence was found of the company’s actions to promote these jobs in a way that ensures gender balance and inclusion of vulnerable groups.
No relevant disclosure was found of the company’s assessment of employment dislocation risks. Further, no public commitment by the company was found stating its intention to reskill and upskill workers displaced by the transition to a low-carbon economy. Additionally, no evidence was found that the company reskills and upskills workers in a way that ensures gender balance and inclusion of vulnerable groups.

No relevant disclosure was found to show if the company identifies the impacts of the low-carbon transition on social protection for workers and affected stakeholders, nor how it contributes to their social protection. Additionally, no evidence was found that the company expects its business relationships to contribute to the social protection of their workers and affected stakeholders.
No relevant disclosure was found to show how the company identifies any misalignment of its lobbying activities with policies and regulations that support the just transition, nor of the measures it takes to address misalignment. Furthermore, no evidence was found that the company lobbies for policies and regulations for green and decent job creation; retention, education and reskilling; and social protection for workers.

No company policies or commitments related to respect for human rights were found in the public domain. This includes the necessary policies and systems by which the company can ensure respect for basic human rights in its operations and supply chain.

No evidence of the company’s policies or commitments related to key decent work issues was found in the public domain. These issues include the provision of safe, secure and healthy workplaces, where workers are fairly renumerated and have a meaningful say in decision-making.

No company policies or commitments related to key ethical business topics – personal data protection, tax, bribery and corruption, and lobbying and political engagement – were found in the public domain. This includes ensuring ethical business conduct throughout its operations and in its business relationships.