Filter per region

Filter per scope of activities

Module 8, policy engagement, assesses companies’ political influence from the perspective of three indicators.

The three indicators are:

  1. Whether the company has a policy on what action to take when the industry or trade associations it belongs to are found to oppose climate policies (indicator 8.1, weighted 1% of the performance assessment)
  2. Whether the company engages with any industry or trade associations that hold climate-negative positions through board membership or funding (indicator 8.2, weighted 2% of the performance assessment)
  3. Whether the company publicly supports or obstructs climate policies (indicator 8.2, weighted 2% of the performance assessment)

Ranking overview

1 Engie
Total score 70.0 /100
Policy Engagement 70.0 /100
- GAIL (India)
Total score 70.0 /100
Policy Engagement 70.0 /100
3 Indian Oil Corporation (IndianOil)
Total score 60.0 /100
Policy Engagement 60.0 /100
- Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC)
Total score 60.0 /100
Policy Engagement 60.0 /100
- Pertamina
Total score 60.0 /100
Policy Engagement 60.0 /100
- SK Innovation
Total score 60.0 /100
Policy Engagement 60.0 /100
- Viva Energy Group
Total score 60.0 /100
Policy Engagement 60.0 /100
8 BHP Group
Total score 59.0 /100
Policy Engagement 59.0 /100
9 Sasol
Total score 54.0 /100
Policy Engagement 54.0 /100
10 Ecopetrol 
Total score 50.0 /100
Policy Engagement 50.0 /100
- Ultrapar
Total score 50.0 /100
Policy Engagement 50.0 /100
12 Eni
Total score 45.0 /100
Policy Engagement 45.0 /100
13 Compania Espanola de Petroleos SAU (CEPSA)
Total score 44.0 /100
Policy Engagement 44.0 /100
- EOG Resources 
Total score 44.0 /100
Policy Engagement 44.0 /100
- Origin Energy
Total score 44.0 /100
Policy Engagement 44.0 /100
16 Hellenic Petroleum
Total score 40.0 /100
Policy Engagement 40.0 /100
- Lukoil
Total score 40.0 /100
Policy Engagement 40.0 /100
- NK KazMunayGaz
Total score 40.0 /100
Policy Engagement 40.0 /100
- Qatar Petroleum
Total score 40.0 /100
Policy Engagement 40.0 /100
- Tatneft
Total score 40.0 /100
Policy Engagement 40.0 /100
21 Woodside Petroleum
Total score 39.0 /100
Policy Engagement 39.0 /100
22 Galp Energia
Total score 38.0 /100
Policy Engagement 38.0 /100
23 Naturgy Energy
Total score 36.0 /100
Policy Engagement 36.0 /100
24 ConocoPhillips
Total score 33.0 /100
Policy Engagement 33.0 /100
- OMV
Total score 33.0 /100
Policy Engagement 33.0 /100
26 Petroleo Brasileiro (Petrobras)
Total score 32.0 /100
Policy Engagement 32.0 /100
27 Bharat Petroleum Corporation
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Chesapeake Energy Corp
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC)
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Naftogaz
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Neste
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- PTT
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- PetroSA
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Petroleum Development Oman (PDO)
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen (PKN Orlen)
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Reliance Industries
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Saras
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Sonangol
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR)
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Suncor Energy 
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Targa Resources
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- Türkiye Petrol Rafinerileri
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
- YPF
Total score 30.0 /100
Policy Engagement 30.0 /100
44 MOL Magyar Olajes Gazipari Nyrt
Total score 26.0 /100
Policy Engagement 26.0 /100
45 Marathon Petroleum Corporation
Total score 24.0 /100
Policy Engagement 24.0 /100
- Santos 
Total score 24.0 /100
Policy Engagement 24.0 /100
47 Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC)
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Ampol Limited
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- CPC Corporation, Taiwan
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- California Resources Corporation
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Cenovus Energy
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC Group)
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Formosa Petrochemical Corp
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Gazprom
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Hess Corporation
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Inpex 
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (Q8)
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Novatek
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex)
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Petroliam Nasional Bhd (PETRONAS)
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Rosneft
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
- Royal Dutch Shell
Total score 20.0 /100
Policy Engagement 20.0 /100
63 Equinor
Total score 18.0 /100
Policy Engagement 18.0 /100
- Total
Total score 18.0 /100
Policy Engagement 18.0 /100
65 Repsol
Total score 15.0 /100
Policy Engagement 15.0 /100
66 Apache Corporation
Total score 14.0 /100
Policy Engagement 14.0 /100
- Valero Energy
Total score 14.0 /100
Policy Engagement 14.0 /100
- bp
Total score 14.0 /100
Policy Engagement 14.0 /100
69 Basra Oil Company (BOC)
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Canadian Natural Resources
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation Limited (Sinopec)
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Cosmo Energy Holdings
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Devon Energy Corp
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- ENEOS Holdings
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC)
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Emirates National Oil Company (ENOC)
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Enterprise Products Partners
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- GS Holdings
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Idemitsu Kosan
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Marathon Oil
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- NGL Energy Partners
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC)
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- National Oil Corporation of Libya
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC)
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Occidental Petroleum
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Petroecuador
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA)
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Pioneer Natural Resources 
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Saudi Aramco (SABIC)
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum Group
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Sonatrach
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Surgutneftegas
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- TurkmenGaz
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
- Varo Energy
Total score 10.0 /100
Policy Engagement 10.0 /100
95 Chevron Corporation
Total score 2.0 /100
Policy Engagement 2.0 /100
- Exxon Mobil
Total score 2.0 /100
Policy Engagement 2.0 /100
97 HollyFrontier
Total score 0.0 /100
Policy Engagement 0.0 /100
- PBF Energy 
Total score 0.0 /100
Policy Engagement 0.0 /100
- Phillips 66
Total score 0.0 /100
Policy Engagement 0.0 /100
- Sinochem Energy
Total score 0.0 /100
Policy Engagement 0.0 /100